Shila Jems Gaikwad vs State Govt Through Duyyam Nibandhak State Exices Department Daund — 49/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHPU180004462026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

446/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

49/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Civil Court,Daund

Judge

4-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D AND J.M.F.C. DAUND

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Shila Jems Gaikwad

Adv. JADHAV RAHUL PARASHURAM

Respondent(s)

State Govt Through Duyyam Nibandhak State Exices Department Daund

Hearing History

Judge: 4-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D AND J.M.F.C. DAUND

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted the applicant Sheila James Gayakwad's petition to release a seized vehicle (Mahindra vehicle, Chassis No. MB8DP12DDN8B40680) on a temporary basis against an Rs. 80,000 bond. The court found the applicant to be the rightful owner with documentary evidence and reasoned that keeping the vehicle unused would diminish its utility, while the applicant is not an accused in the case. The vehicle is to be returned subject to specific conditions including preservation of its condition, non-transfer, and production before the court as needed during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the applicant Sheila James Gayakwad's petition to release a seized vehicle (Mahindra vehicle, Chassis No. MB8DP12DDN8B40680) on a temporary basis against an Rs. 80,000 bond. The court found the applicant to be the rightful owner with documentary evidence and reasoned that keeping the vehicle unused would diminish its utility, while the applicant is not an accused in the case. The vehicle is to be returned subject to specific conditions including preservation of its condition, non-transfer, and production before the court as needed during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Daund All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case