Shila Jems Gaikwad vs State Govt Through Duyyam Nibandhak State Exices Department Daund — 49/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHPU180004462026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

446/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

49/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court,Daund

Judge

4-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shila Jems Gaikwad

    Adv. JADHAV RAHUL PARASHURAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Govt Through Duyyam Nibandhak State Exices Department Daund

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted the applicant Sheila James Gayakwad's petition to release a seized vehicle (Mahindra vehicle, Chassis No. MB8DP12DDN8B40680) on a temporary basis against an Rs. 80,000 bond. The court found the applicant to be the rightful owner with documentary evidence and reasoned that keeping the vehicle unused would diminish its utility, while the applicant is not an accused in the case. The vehicle is to be returned subject to specific conditions including preservation of its condition, non-transfer, and production before the court as needed during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D And J.M.F.C. Daund

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 49/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the applicant Sheila James Gayakwad's petition to release a seized vehicle (Mahindra vehicle, Chassis No. MB8DP12DDN8B40680) on a temporary basis against an Rs. 80,000 bond. The court found the applicant to be the rightful owner with documentary evidence and reasoned that keeping the vehicle unused would diminish its utility, while the applicant is not an accused in the case. The vehicle is to be returned subject to specific conditions including preservation of its condition, non-transfer, and production before the court as needed during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case