State of Maharashtra through Indapur ptn vs Ganesh Babasaheb Nangare Advocate - Chaudhari Ranjeet Uttamrao — 881/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),352. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU170030642025
Filing Number
3019/2025
Filing Date
06-Dec-2025
Registration No
881/2025
Registration Date
06-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Court,Indapur
Judge
6-5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Indapur
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
692
Police Station
INDAPUR POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through Indapur ptn
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ganesh Babasaheb Nangare Advocate - Chaudhari Ranjeet Uttamrao
Case History
-
05-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
EvidenceView PDF
Summary: In this First Class Magistrate court order from Indapur (dated 07/03/2026), the witness (complainant) testified regarding an alleged assault incident from 18/09/2025 involving the accused. The court examined the witness's statement and cross-examined him. The accused's counsel declined cross-examination. The witness admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused, documented as Exhibit No. 13, and stated he would not pursue certain complaints against the accused due to this settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Indapur
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Indapur
-
05-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 881/2025
Summary: In this First Class Magistrate court order from Indapur (dated 07/03/2026), the witness (complainant) testified regarding an alleged assault incident from 18/09/2025 involving the accused. The court examined the witness's statement and cross-examined him. The accused's counsel declined cross-examination. The witness admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused, documented as Exhibit No. 13, and stated he would not pursue certain complaints against the accused due to this settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts