Shri Laxman Pandharinath Bhosale vs Mr Devidas Nagnath Gaikwad — 377/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 379 215. Status: Verification. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHPU170025822024
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
28-09-2024
Filing Number
2075/2024
Filing Date
03-10-2024
Registration No
377/2024
Registration Date
07-10-2024
Court
Civil Court,Indapur
Judge
1-2nd Jt Civil Judge Junior Division Indapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri Laxman Pandharinath Bhosale
Adv. तांबोळी एस.यु.
Respondent(s)
Mr Devidas Nagnath Gaikwad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd Jt Civil Judge Junior Division Indapur
Verification
Verification
Verification
Verification
Verification
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Verification | |
| 10-02-2026 | Verification | |
| 26-12-2025 | Verification | |
| 10-12-2025 | Verification | |
| 30-10-2025 | Verification |
Interim Orders
This is a court order from the First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Indapur, Pune, dated 22/04/2025, regarding a civil matter involving property and monetary disputes. The complainant (Lakshman Pandhrinath Bhosley) filed an application against the defendant (Devidaas Naganath Gayakwad) alleging breach of contract regarding land and flat purchase transactions worth Rs. 7,00,000 each, claiming false evidence was submitted. The court's order directs that the defendant should be prosecuted and the complainant be granted appropriate relief, while rejecting the defendant's claims of lack of notice and inadequate evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a court order from the First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Indapur, Pune, dated 22/04/2025, regarding a civil matter involving property and monetary disputes. The complainant (Lakshman Pandhrinath Bhosley) filed an application against the defendant (Devidaas Naganath Gayakwad) alleging breach of contract regarding land and flat purchase transactions worth Rs. 7,00,000 each, claiming false evidence was submitted. The court's order directs that the defendant should be prosecuted and the complainant be granted appropriate relief, while rejecting the defendant's claims of lack of notice and inadequate evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts