Stete of Maharashtra vs Amabir @ Mahesh Balu Shaikh Advocate - Bansode Rajendra Ramchandra — 763/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304-A,279,337,338,427. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU170016572024
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
09-05-2024
Filing Number
1338/2024
Filing Date
22-06-2024
Registration No
763/2024
Registration Date
05-07-2024
Court
Civil Court,Indapur
Judge
6-5th Jt CJJD and JMFC Indapur
FIR Details
FIR Number
155
Police Station
WALCHANDNAGAR POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Stete of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Amabir @ Mahesh Balu Shaikh Advocate - Bansode Rajendra Ramchandra
Hearing History
Judge: 6-5th Jt CJJD and JMFC Indapur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-12-2025 | Arguments | |
| 27-11-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This is a criminal court order from Indore, Madhya Pradesh (Case No. 763/2024, Order No. 24) dated August 21, 2025. The court rejected the accused's arguments challenging the investigation and evidence, including claims that he never met the victim, that there were no eyewitnesses, and that the FIR was falsely registered. The court found the investigation proper and the accused's contentions unsubstantiated, ultimately dismissing the accused's petition and upholding the charges against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a criminal court order from Indore, Madhya Pradesh (Case No. 763/2024, Order No. 24) dated August 21, 2025. The court rejected the accused's arguments challenging the investigation and evidence, including claims that he never met the victim, that there were no eyewitnesses, and that the FIR was falsely registered. The court found the investigation proper and the accused's contentions unsubstantiated, ultimately dismissing the accused's petition and upholding the charges against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts