State of Maharashtra vs Sitaram Baban Khartode Advocate - Sangle Dattatray Sadaba — 246/2020
Case under Indian Forest Act Section 26(1),D,F,H,63K,65A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU170015202020
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1234/2020
Filing Date
14-10-2020
Registration No
246/2020
Registration Date
14-10-2020
Court
Civil Court,Indapur
Judge
2-4th Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Indapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Sitaram Baban Khartode Advocate - Sangle Dattatray Sadaba
Hearing History
Judge: 2-4th Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Indapur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 01-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 20-09-2025 | Evidence | |
| 21-06-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In FIR No. 246/2020 against Sitaram Khartoде, a forest guard testified that on 23/03/2017, he found a 465-meter long, 2-meter wide pipe with a 5-inch diameter diameter pipe laid in Forest Plot No. 1575 in Indapur taluka. During cross-examination, the defense counsel challenged the authenticity of the evidence, arguing that no documentary proof was provided to establish the pipe belonged to the accused. The court found the prosecution case lacks substantive evidence and accordingly dismissed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In FIR No. 246/2020 against Sitaram Khartoде, a forest guard testified that on 23/03/2017, he found a 465-meter long, 2-meter wide pipe with a 5-inch diameter diameter pipe laid in Forest Plot No. 1575 in Indapur taluka. During cross-examination, the defense counsel challenged the authenticity of the evidence, arguing that no documentary proof was provided to establish the pipe belonged to the accused. The court found the prosecution case lacks substantive evidence and accordingly dismissed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts