Suvarnayug Rural Non Agricultural Co Credit Society Marya Nimgaon Ketki Through Mr Anil R Bhong vs Chinmay Chandrakant Bhujbal — 147/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Awaiting Summons Next hearing 02-May-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU170002112026

e-Filing Number

31-01-2026

Filing Number

211/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

147/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court,Indapur

Judge

6-5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Indapur

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suvarnayug Rural Non Agricultural Co Credit Society Marya Nimgaon Ketki Through Mr Anil R Bhong

    Adv. BANSODE RAJENDRA RAMCHANDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chinmay Chandrakant Bhujbal

Case History

  1. 02-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court found a prima facie case against the accused Chinmay Chandrakant Bhujbal for dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Process has been issued against the accused, as the cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds and the accused failed to make payment despite receiving a mandatory demand notice within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    5th Jt Cjjd and JMFC Indapur

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court found a prima facie case against the accused Chinmay Chandrakant Bhujbal for dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Process has been issued against the accused, as the cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds and the accused failed to make payment despite receiving a mandatory demand notice within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case