The State of Maharashtra vs Goutam Shahaji Kakde Advocate - Jagtap Shivajirao Nanasaheb — 190/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,307,143,147,148,149,352,504,506,201,. Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHPU140033222024
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1819/2024
Filing Date
04-10-2024
Registration No
190/2024
Registration Date
05-10-2024
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
16-District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
FIR Details
FIR Number
283
Police Station
VADGAON NIMBALKAR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Goutam Shahaji Kakde Advocate - Jagtap Shivajirao Nanasaheb
Gaourav Shahaji kakade
Adv. Jagtap Shivajirao Nanasaheb
Shahaji Mugutrao Kakade
Adv. Jagtap Shivajirao Nanasaheb,Jagtap Shivajirao Nanasaheb
Sachin Vasant Motaktte
Ajit Kisan More
Adv. Bhagwat Bapurao Bandu
Dada Vittal Dagade
Adv. Kakade Satyajit Rajendra
Hearing History
Judge: 16-District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 02-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
Interim Orders
Case No. 190/2024 - Order Summary The court directed the prosecution to produce the Forensic Science Laboratory report analyzing a DVR allegedly seized from accused no. 6, which was sent for analysis on 31.07.2024 but had not yet been produced. The case was adjourned pending submission of this forensic report, which is necessary for proper adjudication of the discharge applications filed by accused nos. 5 and 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case No. 190/2024 - Order Summary The court directed the prosecution to produce the Forensic Science Laboratory report analyzing a DVR allegedly seized from accused no. 6, which was sent for analysis on 31.07.2024 but had not yet been produced. The case was adjourned pending submission of this forensic report, which is necessary for proper adjudication of the discharge applications filed by accused nos. 5 and 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts