The State of Maharashtra vs Kashim Rakamuddin Shaikh Advocate - ADHAV SURAJ DNYANDEV — 299/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2), 78. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHPU140031222024

Hearing

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1701/2024

Filing Date

21-09-2024

Registration No

299/2024

Registration Date

25-09-2024

Court

Additional District Court, Baramati

Judge

10-ADHOC D.J. 1 AND ADJ BARAMATI DISTRICT PUNE.

FIR Details

FIR Number

543

Police Station

DAUND P.S.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2), 78
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Kashim Rakamuddin Shaikh Advocate - ADHAV SURAJ DNYANDEV

Hearing History

Judge: 10-ADHOC D.J. 1 AND ADJ BARAMATI DISTRICT PUNE.

07-03-2026

Hearing

02-02-2026

Hearing

17-01-2026

Hearing

06-01-2026

Hearing

23-12-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

23-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

BAIL GRANTED The court allowed the bail application of accused Kasim Rakumuddin Shaikh in a POCSO Act case involving charges under BNS Sections 137(2), 78, and POCSO Section 12. The applicant was released on bail upon furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety, subject to strict conditions including: non-contact with the victim (physically or virtually), regular court attendance, residence proof submission, and prohibition from entering the victim's village. The court found insufficient evidence of kidnapping or sexual assault, noting the victim's initial statement did not allege harassment by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

BAIL GRANTED The court allowed the bail application of accused Kasim Rakumuddin Shaikh in a POCSO Act case involving charges under BNS Sections 137(2), 78, and POCSO Section 12. The applicant was released on bail upon furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety, subject to strict conditions including: non-contact with the victim (physically or virtually), regular court attendance, residence proof submission, and prohibition from entering the victim's village. The court found insufficient evidence of kidnapping or sexual assault, noting the victim's initial statement did not allege harassment by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Court, Baramati All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case