The State of Maharashtra thr Malegaon Police station vs Shivaji Dilip Kambale Advocate - Sargar Ramchandra Eknath — 267/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366(a),376(2)(n),506,420,465,468,471. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU140026192024
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1363/2024
Filing Date
05-08-2024
Registration No
267/2024
Registration Date
12-08-2024
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
10-ADHOC D.J. 1 AND ADJ BARAMATI DISTRICT PUNE.
FIR Details
FIR Number
157
Police Station
Malegaon Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra thr Malegaon Police station
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Shivaji Dilip Kambale Advocate - Sargar Ramchandra Eknath
Hearing History
Judge: 10-ADHOC D.J. 1 AND ADJ BARAMATI DISTRICT PUNE.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for return of the seized Yamaha FZS vehicle (Reg. No. MH-16-CT-6007) was allowed. The court ordered the investigating officer to hand over the vehicle to accused Shivaji Dilip Kamble upon execution of a surety bond of Rs. 1,00,000, citing that physical custody is unnecessary for trial and prolonged storage risks deterioration. The accused must file undertakings not to alter the vehicle, alienate it without court permission, and produce it during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for return of the seized Yamaha FZS vehicle (Reg. No. MH-16-CT-6007) was allowed. The court ordered the investigating officer to hand over the vehicle to accused Shivaji Dilip Kamble upon execution of a surety bond of Rs. 1,00,000, citing that physical custody is unnecessary for trial and prolonged storage risks deterioration. The accused must file undertakings not to alter the vehicle, alienate it without court permission, and produce it during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts