Sagar Mahadev Kate vs Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj Sah Patsanstha Maryadit Pimpode Bu Thr Jayant Ramchandra Salunkhe Advocate - Pawar Yashwant Genba, Pawar Yashwant Genba — 47/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 15-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application

CNR: MHPU140023662025

e-Filing Number

06-11-2025

Filing Number

1561/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

47/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Court

Additional District Court, Baramati

Judge

33-District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sagar Mahadev Kate

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  2. 2.Kiran Shivdas Ghule

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  3. 3.Hemant Suresh Dudhal

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  4. 4.Swati Sarjerao Phule alias Swati Yogesh Dudhal

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  5. 5.Yogesh Suresh Dudhal

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  6. 6.Priya Sawata Mohalkar

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  7. 7.Anju Shamsundar Dhanwani

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  8. 8.Shamsundar Jethanand Dhanwani

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  9. 9.Abhijit Dayaram Mahadik

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  10. 10.Ranjit Dayaram Mahadik

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  11. 11.Sangita Abhijit Mahadik

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  12. 12.Dhiraj Dilip Takale

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  13. 13.Monika Sagar Kate

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  14. 14.Bharat Lahu Jangam

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  15. 15.Ajit Ramesh Pawar

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  16. 16.Ganesh Jagannath Bhosale

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  17. 17.Nilesh Kantilal Bhosale

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  18. 18.Chetan Bharat Jangam

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  19. 19.Akshay Kuberdas Shinde

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

  20. 20.Subhash Ram Padule

    Adv. SHINDE PRITI VIJAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj Sah Patsanstha Maryadit Pimpode Bu Thr Jayant Ramchandra Salunkhe Advocate - Pawar Yashwant Genba, Pawar Yashwant Genba

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: In Criminal Revision Application No. 47/2025, the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati granted an interim stay of the Trial Court's order pending the respondent's filing of a reply on the stay application. The petitioners (20 individuals including women) challenged a cooperative society's proceedings, citing prior favorable orders from the Bombay High Court and Supreme Court in the civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Reply Unready

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  8. 06-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  9. 03-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  10. 28-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  12. 11-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Revision Application No. 47/2025, the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati granted an interim stay of the Trial Court's order pending the respondent's filing of a reply on the stay application. The petitioners (20 individuals including women) challenged a cooperative society's proceedings, citing prior favorable orders from the Bombay High Court and Supreme Court in the civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case