State Of Maharshtra baramati city police Station vs Amir Salim Zarekari Advocate - Sohel Shaikh — 190/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,354(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU140022602020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1528/2020
Filing Date
19-10-2020
Registration No
190/2020
Registration Date
23-10-2020
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
822
Police Station
BARAMATI CITY P.S.
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharshtra baramati city police Station
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Amir Salim Zarekari Advocate - Sohel Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 19-01-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Judge at Baramati acquitted Amir Salim Zarekari of charges under IPC Sections 354, 354D(2) and POCSO Act Sections 8, 12, finding the prosecution failed to establish the alleged sexual assault and harassment against a 14-year-old victim. The victim, her parents, and investigating officer's testimony did not substantiate the incident, and the victim herself disowned the allegations during cross-examination, admitting to compromising the matter with the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Special Judge at Baramati acquitted Amir Salim Zarekari of charges under IPC Sections 354, 354D(2) and POCSO Act Sections 8, 12, finding the prosecution failed to establish the alleged sexual assault and harassment against a 14-year-old victim. The victim, her parents, and investigating officer's testimony did not substantiate the incident, and the victim herself disowned the allegations during cross-examination, admitting to compromising the matter with the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts