State Yavat P S vs Vikas Popat Dhamal — 149/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),70(1),333,352,351(2)(3),3(5). Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHPU140018852025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1241/2025
Filing Date
30-08-2025
Registration No
149/2025
Registration Date
02-09-2025
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
16-District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
FIR Details
FIR Number
510
Police Station
YAWAT P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Yavat P S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vikas Popat Dhamal
Kuldip Suresh Temgire
Sanjay Rajaram Waghmode
Arun Prakash Gadekar
Hearing History
Judge: 16-District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal | |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order | |
| 06-03-2026 | Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: Bail granted. Accused Vikas Popat Dhamal was granted regular bail in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 64(1), 70(1), 333, 352, 351(2)(3), and 3(5) for alleged domestic violence and forced sexual intercourse. The court found that the 2-year delay in filing the FIR, completion of investigation, filing of chargesheet, and release of co-accused justified bail despite serious charges. Bail was conditioned on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with sureties and restrictions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Bail granted. Accused Vikas Popat Dhamal was granted regular bail in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 64(1), 70(1), 333, 352, 351(2)(3), and 3(5) for alleged domestic violence and forced sexual intercourse. The court found that the 2-year delay in filing the FIR, completion of investigation, filing of chargesheet, and release of co-accused justified bail despite serious charges. Bail was conditioned on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with sureties and restrictions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts