State BMT City P S vs Lahu Rama Waykar — 144/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),109(1). Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.

Awaiting Muddemal Next hearing 13-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHPU140018432025

Filing Number

1207/2025

Filing Date

26-Aug-2025

Registration No

144/2025

Registration Date

26-Aug-2025

Court

Additional District Court, Baramati

Judge

16-District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

179

Police Station

BARAMATI CITY P.S.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),109(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State BMT City P S

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lahu Rama Waykar

Case History

  1. 13-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary Bail Application Rejected — The court denied regular bail to Lahu Rama Waykar, accused of murdering his wife Sanjana Lahu Waykar (Crime No. 179/2025, Baramati City Police Station). The Additional Sessions Judge found prima facie evidence of guilt, including the murder weapon seized from the accused's possession, and determined that the serious nature of the offense and risk of witness tampering warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  10. 15-Jan-2026

    Order

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  12. 24-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  13. 10-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  14. 04-Dec-2025

    Production of Accused

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  15. 26-Nov-2025

    Production of Accused

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  16. 20-Nov-2025

    Production of Accused

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  17. 14-Nov-2025

    Production of Accused

    District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati

  18. 16-Oct-2025

    Production of Accused

    Adhoc District Judge 1 and Assistant Sessions Judge Baramati Dist Pune

  19. 10-Oct-2025

    Production of Accused

    Adhoc District Judge 1 and Assistant Sessions Judge Baramati Dist Pune

  20. 30-Sep-2025

    Production of Accused

    Adhoc District Judge 1 and Assistant Sessions Judge Baramati Dist Pune

  21. 20-Sep-2025

    Production of Accused

    Adhoc District Judge 1 and Assistant Sessions Judge Baramati Dist Pune

  22. 09-Sep-2025

    Production of Accused

    Adhoc District Judge 1 and Assistant Sessions Judge Baramati Dist Pune

  23. 26-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 26-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 144/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Bail Application Rejected — The court denied regular bail to Lahu Rama Waykar, accused of murdering his wife Sanjana Lahu Waykar (Crime No. 179/2025, Baramati City Police Station). The Additional Sessions Judge found prima facie evidence of guilt, including the murder weapon seized from the accused's possession, and determined that the serious nature of the offense and risk of witness tampering warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case