State Daund P S vs Akash Kantilal Rathod Advocate - Bandal Sandipan Tulshiram — 155/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 189(2),191(2)(3),190,118(1),352,351(2). Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU140017962025
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1171/2025
Filing Date
19-08-2025
Registration No
155/2025
Registration Date
26-08-2025
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI
FIR Details
FIR Number
325
Police Station
DAUND P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Daund P S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Akash Kantilal Rathod Advocate - Bandal Sandipan Tulshiram
Sahil Sanjiv Rathod
Abhijit Pandurang Rathod
Samir Subhash Rathod
Premkumar Vishvanath Chavan
Hearing History
Judge: 33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Report
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 25-02-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 09-02-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 19-01-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 05-01-2026 | Report |
Interim Orders
Summary: Interim bail was granted to all five accused (Akash Kantilal Rathod, Sahil Sanjiv Rathod, Abhijit Pandurang Rathod, Samir Subhash Rathod, and Premkumar Vishwanath Chavan) pending decision on their main bail application in Crime No. 325/2025. Each accused must execute a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of the same amount and comply with conditions including non-interference with witnesses and evidence. The court noted the accused were never arrested during investigation, appeared on summons, and face offences punishable up to five years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Interim bail was granted to all five accused (Akash Kantilal Rathod, Sahil Sanjiv Rathod, Abhijit Pandurang Rathod, Samir Subhash Rathod, and Premkumar Vishwanath Chavan) pending decision on their main bail application in Crime No. 325/2025. Each accused must execute a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of the same amount and comply with conditions including non-interference with witnesses and evidence. The court noted the accused were never arrested during investigation, appeared on summons, and face offences punishable up to five years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts