State Malegaon P S vs Rushikesh Santosh Mane Advocate - Pataskar Sudhir Sharad — 96/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(1),74,76,333,115(2),351(2). Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHPU140011302025

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

760/2025

Filing Date

23-05-2025

Registration No

96/2025

Registration Date

23-05-2025

Court

Additional District Court, Baramati

Judge

33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI

FIR Details

FIR Number

67

Police Station

Malegaon Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(1),74,76,333,115(2),351(2)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

State Malegaon P S

Adv. Navale Kamalakar Shankarrao

Respondent(s)

Rushikesh Santosh Mane Advocate - Pataskar Sudhir Sharad

Hearing History

Judge: 33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI

16-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

07-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

20-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-02-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

08-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rushikesh Santosh Mane Outcome: Bail granted. The court allowed the accused's bail application and ordered his release on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with a solvent surety of equal amount, imposed strict conditions including prohibition from approaching the victim/witnesses, monthly police check-ins, and no interference with evidence or witnesses until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rushikesh Santosh Mane Outcome: Bail granted. The court allowed the accused's bail application and ordered his release on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with a solvent surety of equal amount, imposed strict conditions including prohibition from approaching the victim/witnesses, monthly police check-ins, and no interference with evidence or witnesses until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Court, Baramati All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case