State Supa P S vs Somnath Ganpat Dhangekar — 83/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),74,115(2),118(1),3(5),351(2),352. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU140010782025
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
709/2025
Filing Date
14-05-2025
Registration No
83/2025
Registration Date
15-05-2025
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
SUPA POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Supa P S
Adv. Vasekar Sunil Ishwar
Respondent(s)
Somnath Ganpat Dhangekar
Santosh Kundlik Karche(Abscond)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI
Charge
Charge
Charge
N.B.W._Unready
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 28-01-2026 | Charge | |
| 26-11-2025 | Charge | |
| 06-10-2025 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 04-09-2025 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the application filed by Swati Somnath Dhangekar under Section 503 B.N.S.S. for return of her seized Tata Safari vehicle. Interim custody of the vehicle was granted to the registered owner upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 30 lakhs, with conditions that she cannot sell/transfer it without court permission, cannot misuse it for illegal activities, and must produce it as required. The investigating officer was directed to photograph and document the vehicle before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the application filed by Swati Somnath Dhangekar under Section 503 B.N.S.S. for return of her seized Tata Safari vehicle. Interim custody of the vehicle was granted to the registered owner upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 30 lakhs, with conditions that she cannot sell/transfer it without court permission, cannot misuse it for illegal activities, and must produce it as required. The investigating officer was directed to photograph and document the vehicle before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts