State Of Maharashtra Yawat Police Statin vs Foujsinh @ Ajay Ratansinh Chotodiya Advocate - More Vijaysinh Nanasaheb — 73/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHPU140008202022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
463/2022
Filing Date
17-03-2022
Registration No
73/2022
Registration Date
24-03-2022
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
968
Police Station
YAWAT P.S.
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra Yawat Police Statin
Adv. A.p.P.
Respondent(s)
Foujsinh @ Ajay Ratansinh Chotodiya Advocate - More Vijaysinh Nanasaheb
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Baramati District Court acquitted Faujasinh @ Ajay Ratansinh Chitodiya of murder charges (IPC Section 302) in the death of his father Ratansinh Chitodiya. While the court confirmed the death was homicidal (caused by head injury), it found the prosecution failed to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because confessional statements to police are inadmissible under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act, the sole eyewitness (accused's wife) was not examined, and circumstantial evidence had critical gaps. The accused was acquitted on 02/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Baramati District Court acquitted Faujasinh @ Ajay Ratansinh Chitodiya of murder charges (IPC Section 302) in the death of his father Ratansinh Chitodiya. While the court confirmed the death was homicidal (caused by head injury), it found the prosecution failed to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because confessional statements to police are inadmissible under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act, the sole eyewitness (accused's wife) was not examined, and circumstantial evidence had critical gaps. The accused was acquitted on 02/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts