Sangita Abhijeet Mahadik vs Bhavesh Bhushan Dhamal Advocate - Pawar Yashwant Genba — 8/2021

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application

CNR: MHPU140006432021

Hearing

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

375/2021

Filing Date

01-03-2021

Registration No

8/2021

Registration Date

08-03-2021

Court

Additional District Court, Baramati

Judge

33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 397

Petitioner(s)

Sangita Abhijeet Mahadik

Adv. Kale Amar Mahadevrao

Abhijeet Dayaram Mahadik

Adv. Kale Amar Mahadevrao

Sagar Mahadev Kate

Adv. Kale Amar Mahadevrao

Respondent(s)

Bhavesh Bhushan Dhamal Advocate - Pawar Yashwant Genba

Somnath Hanumant Nale

Santosh Rajaram Jagtap

Shantaram Phadtare

Ganesh Ashok Pawar

jayant Ramchandra Salunke

Rambhau Anandrao Lambhe

Suresh Gangaram Salunke

Hanumant Dnyaneshwar Pawar

Baburao Tukaram Kakade

Dhanaji Narayan Jadhav

Bhalchandra Raghunath Jadhav

Tatyasaheb Nivrutti Dhamal

Hanumant Baburao Nikam

Rajendra Vasantrao Ingole

Adv. Pataskar Sudhir Sharad

State OF Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI

02-04-2026

Hearing

16-03-2026

Reply/Say

07-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

09-02-2026

Notice_Unready

19-01-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

17-01-2022
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati has allowed the criminal revision petition against the JMFC's order rejecting a complaint forwarding request under Section 156(3) CrPC. Following Supreme Court precedent that accused persons have a right to be heard in revision proceedings challenging complaint dismissals, the court ordered notice to be issued to respondents 1-15, requiring them to be heard before the matter proceeds further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati has allowed the criminal revision petition against the JMFC's order rejecting a complaint forwarding request under Section 156(3) CrPC. Following Supreme Court precedent that accused persons have a right to be heard in revision proceedings challenging complaint dismissals, the court ordered notice to be issued to respondents 1-15, requiring them to be heard before the matter proceeds further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Court, Baramati All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case