Dhiraj Chandrakant Shitole vs State Of Maharashtra through Baramati City Police Station — 162/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 07th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHPU140003882026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

295/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

162/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Additional District Court, Baramati

Judge

33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

Police Station

BARAMATI CITY P.S.

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Dhiraj Chandrakant Shitole

Adv. Sachin Shahaji More

Respondent(s)

State Of Maharashtra through Baramati City Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Reply Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted bail to accused Dhiraj Chandrakant Shitole in a cheque dishonor case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, despite his prior defaults in court appearance. The court ordered his release on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety, finding that custody was unnecessary for a bailable offense with limited punishment, while imposing conditions for regular court attendance and expedited trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to accused Dhiraj Chandrakant Shitole in a cheque dishonor case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, despite his prior defaults in court appearance. The court ordered his release on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety, finding that custody was unnecessary for a bailable offense with limited punishment, while imposing conditions for regular court attendance and expedited trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Court, Baramati All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case