Mohammad Anis Mohammad Yunus vs State of Maharashtra through Baramati taluka Police station — 160/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(1), 303(2) , 3(5). Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU140003852026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
293/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
160/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
52
Police Station
BARAMATI TALUKA P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammad Anis Mohammad Yunus
Adv. AWAGHADE RAVINDRA HANUMANT
Aizaz Bhangu Mirawale
Adv. AWAGHADE RAVINDRA HANUMANT
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through Baramati taluka Police station
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI
Disposed
Order
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order | |
| 13-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 11-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of accused Mohammad Anis Mohammad Yunus and Aizaz Bhangu Mirawale in a gold chain snatching case during late Deputy Chief Minister Ajitdada Pawar's funeral at Baramati. The court found sufficient evidence of their complicity in the serious crime involving theft of gold worth Rs. 48.5 lakh, noting that releasing them would risk evidence destruction and investigation interference while recovery efforts and vehicle seizures remain pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of accused Mohammad Anis Mohammad Yunus and Aizaz Bhangu Mirawale in a gold chain snatching case during late Deputy Chief Minister Ajitdada Pawar's funeral at Baramati. The court found sufficient evidence of their complicity in the serious crime involving theft of gold worth Rs. 48.5 lakh, noting that releasing them would risk evidence destruction and investigation interference while recovery efforts and vehicle seizures remain pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts