RAM ANIL LOKHANDE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH BARAMATI TALUKA POLICE STATION C R NO 493 OF 2025 — 159/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU140003842026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
292/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
159/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
493
Police Station
BARAMATI TALUKA P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAM ANIL LOKHANDE
Adv. Sachin Shahaji More
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH BARAMATI TALUKA POLICE STATION C R NO 493 OF 2025
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI
Disposed
Order
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order | |
| 13-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 11-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court at Baramati, Maharashtra granted bail to both accused (Tanmay alias Tanmesh Sudhir Salunkhe and Ram Anil Lokhande) in a violent assault case. The court found that while the accused had complicity in the alleged crime involving a hotel brawl with weapons, the injuries were only simple in nature, the investigation was complete, both had no criminal antecedents, and prolonged detention was unjustified—applying the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception." Each accused was released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 with sureties and strict conditions including monthly police station attendance and restrictions on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Court at Baramati, Maharashtra granted bail to both accused (Tanmay alias Tanmesh Sudhir Salunkhe and Ram Anil Lokhande) in a violent assault case. The court found that while the accused had complicity in the alleged crime involving a hotel brawl with weapons, the injuries were only simple in nature, the investigation was complete, both had no criminal antecedents, and prolonged detention was unjustified—applying the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception." Each accused was released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 with sureties and strict conditions including monthly police station attendance and restrictions on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts