MAHESH SAKHARAM AHIRE vs State of Maharashtra — 155/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU140003732026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
281/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
155/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
16-District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
30
Police Station
VADGAON NIMBALKAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHESH SAKHARAM AHIRE
Adv. Ajit Balasaheb Gandal
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 16-District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
Disposed
Order
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order | |
| 06-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 05-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 02-03-2026 | Unready Board |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Maharashtra Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to eight accused in a criminal assault case involving a family dispute. The court found that investigation was substantially complete with weapons seized and witnesses recorded, the informant sustained only a bleeding injury (not grievous as alleged), and continued detention served no purpose; bail was granted with conditions including ₹50,000 personal bonds, weekly police attendance, and restrictions on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Maharashtra Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to eight accused in a criminal assault case involving a family dispute. The court found that investigation was substantially complete with weapons seized and witnesses recorded, the informant sustained only a bleeding injury (not grievous as alleged), and continued detention served no purpose; bail was granted with conditions including ₹50,000 personal bonds, weekly police attendance, and restrictions on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts