MAHESH SAKHARAM AHIRE vs State of Maharashtra — 155/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU140003732026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
281/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
155/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
16-District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
30
Police Station
VADGAON NIMBALKAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH SAKHARAM AHIRE
Adv. Ajit Balasaheb Gandal
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Maharashtra Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to eight accused in a criminal assault case involving a family dispute. The court found that investigation was substantially complete with weapons seized and witnesses recorded, the informant sustained only a bleeding injury (not grievous as alleged), and continued detention served no purpose; bail was granted with conditions including ₹50,000 personal bonds, weekly police attendance, and restrictions on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
-
07-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
-
06-Mar-2026
Unready Board
District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
-
05-Mar-2026
Unready Board
District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 155/2026
The Maharashtra Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to eight accused in a criminal assault case involving a family dispute. The court found that investigation was substantially complete with weapons seized and witnesses recorded, the informant sustained only a bleeding injury (not grievous as alleged), and continued detention served no purpose; bail was granted with conditions including ₹50,000 personal bonds, weekly police attendance, and restrictions on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts