Yuvraj Subhash Thorat vs State of Maharashtra through AGP and Baramati city police station — 147/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394,397,341,12(b),511,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU140003522026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
266/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
147/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
516
Police Station
BARAMATI CITY P.S.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yuvraj Subhash Thorat
Adv. BHOSALE ATUL TUKARAM
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through AGP and Baramati city police station
Hearing History
Judge: 33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI
Disposed
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 04-03-2026 | Notice_Unready | |
| 02-03-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Baramati rejected the anticipatory bail application of Yuvraj Subhash Thorat, accused of armed robbery of Rs. 1,99,000 from a petrol pump manager in August 2023. The court found that the accused allegedly used a pistol to assault the complainant during the robbery, participated in a conspiracy with other arrested accused, has prior criminal antecedents, and has absconded—factors that outweigh bail considerations under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code for serious offences under Sections 394 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Baramati rejected the anticipatory bail application of Yuvraj Subhash Thorat, accused of armed robbery of Rs. 1,99,000 from a petrol pump manager in August 2023. The court found that the accused allegedly used a pistol to assault the complainant during the robbery, participated in a conspiracy with other arrested accused, has prior criminal antecedents, and has absconded—factors that outweigh bail considerations under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code for serious offences under Sections 394 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts