ASHOK BABURAO JADHAV vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH BARAMATI POLICE STATION — 143/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 07th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHPU140003422026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

258/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

143/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Additional District Court, Baramati

Judge

4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

0046

Police Station

BARAMATI CITY P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(2),336(3),340(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

ASHOK BABURAO JADHAV

Adv. NAGARKAR SOMNATH GOPALRAO

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH BARAMATI POLICE STATION

Hearing History

Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Order

02-03-2026

Reply/Say

24-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ashok Baburao Jadhav, who was accused of fabricating educational documents to secure government employment with the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation. The court found prima-facie evidence that the accused intentionally altered his school leaving certificate and used the forged document to deceive the government, determining that custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the root cause of the crime and identify any co-conspirators involved in the document fabrication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ashok Baburao Jadhav, who was accused of fabricating educational documents to secure government employment with the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation. The court found prima-facie evidence that the accused intentionally altered his school leaving certificate and used the forged document to deceive the government, determining that custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the root cause of the crime and identify any co-conspirators involved in the document fabrication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Court, Baramati All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case