ASHOK BABURAO JADHAV vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH BARAMATI POLICE STATION — 143/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 07th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU140003422026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
258/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
143/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
4-District Judge-2 And Addl. Session Judge Baramati
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0046
Police Station
BARAMATI CITY P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK BABURAO JADHAV
Adv. NAGARKAR SOMNATH GOPALRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH BARAMATI POLICE STATION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ashok Baburao Jadhav, who was accused of fabricating educational documents to secure government employment with the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation. The court found prima-facie evidence that the accused intentionally altered his school leaving certificate and used the forged document to deceive the government, determining that custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the root cause of the crime and identify any co-conspirators involved in the document fabrication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-2 And Addl. Session Judge Baramati
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-2 And Addl. Session Judge Baramati
-
02-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-2 And Addl. Session Judge Baramati
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 143/2026
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ashok Baburao Jadhav, who was accused of fabricating educational documents to secure government employment with the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation. The court found prima-facie evidence that the accused intentionally altered his school leaving certificate and used the forged document to deceive the government, determining that custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the root cause of the crime and identify any co-conspirators involved in the document fabrication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts