State Malegaon P S vs Bharat Alis Sunny Tanaji Pondkule — 45/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),118(1),115(2),126(2),352,351(2). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU140003212026
Filing Number
245/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
45/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
4-District Judge-2 And Addl. Session Judge Baramati
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
314
Police Station
Malegaon Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Malegaon P S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bharat Alis Sunny Tanaji Pondkule
Case History
-
06-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge-2 And Addl. Session Judge Baramati
-
07-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
OUTCOME SUMMARY: Bail application rejected. The court denied bail to accused Bharat @ Sunny Tanaji Pondkule in a serious attempted murder case (Section 109, BNS 2023) involving an assault with a scythe on the head of the informant. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of guilt, criminal antecedents, risk of witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and crime repetition, making bail unsuitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge-2 And Addl. Session Judge Baramati
-
06-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
District Judge-2 And Addl. Session Judge Baramati
-
04-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
District Judge-2 And Addl. Session Judge Baramati
-
02-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-2 And Addl. Session Judge Baramati
-
26-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-2 And Addl. Session Judge Baramati
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 45/2026
OUTCOME SUMMARY: Bail application rejected. The court denied bail to accused Bharat @ Sunny Tanaji Pondkule in a serious attempted murder case (Section 109, BNS 2023) involving an assault with a scythe on the head of the informant. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of guilt, criminal antecedents, risk of witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and crime repetition, making bail unsuitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts