Rutvik Santosh Bade vs State Of Maharashtra through Baramati City Police Station — 113/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHPU140002792026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

217/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

113/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

Additional District Court, Baramati

Judge

33-District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

BARAMATI CITY P.S.

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Indian Penal Code Section 354,327,323,324,427,504,506, 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rutvik Santosh Bade

    Adv. KARCHE MAYUR TANAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra through Baramati City Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected Rutvik Santosh Bade's anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC for charges including outraging modesty (IPC §354), voluntarily causing hurt (§327), and assault (§§324, 323, 504, 506, 427). The court found sufficient evidence that Bade assaulted the complainant and his wife with weapons, snatched a mangalsutra, and made threats; notably, the victim-wife filed an affidavit opposing bail. Since no new material emerged after the previous bail rejection and the investigating officer required custody for recovery purposes, the court determined bail was unjustified given the serious nature of the offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Report

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Report

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    Report

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Report

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 113/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected Rutvik Santosh Bade's anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC for charges including outraging modesty (IPC §354), voluntarily causing hurt (§327), and assault (§§324, 323, 504, 506, 427). The court found sufficient evidence that Bade assaulted the complainant and his wife with weapons, snatched a mangalsutra, and made threats; notably, the victim-wife filed an affidavit opposing bail. Since no new material emerged after the previous bail rejection and the investigating officer required custody for recovery purposes, the court determined bail was unjustified given the serious nature of the offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case