SANSKAR ABASO PATOLE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 96/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHPU140002532026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

195/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

96/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

Additional District Court, Baramati

Judge

10-ADHOC D.J. 1 AND ADJ BARAMATI DISTRICT PUNE.

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

690

Police Station

DAUND P.S.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

SANSKAR ABASO PATOLE

Adv. JAMDAR RAHUL BALWANTRAO

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: 10-ADHOC D.J. 1 AND ADJ BARAMATI DISTRICT PUNE.

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Order

23-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

18-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY: The Special Judge at Baramati rejected the bail application of Sanskar Abaso Patole, accused of murdering his father Dattatray Patole under sections 103(1) and 238 r/w. 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement based on ten injuries found on the deceased's body, medical opinion of death by intracranial hemorrhage due to trauma, witness statements, and the accused's conduct in attempting to conceal evidence. Considering the serious nature of the offense (punishable by life imprisonment or death), ongoing investigation, risk of evidence tampering and witness intimidation, and the absence of changed circumstances, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Special Judge at Baramati rejected the bail application of Sanskar Abaso Patole, accused of murdering his father Dattatray Patole under sections 103(1) and 238 r/w. 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement based on ten injuries found on the deceased's body, medical opinion of death by intracranial hemorrhage due to trauma, witness statements, and the accused's conduct in attempting to conceal evidence. Considering the serious nature of the offense (punishable by life imprisonment or death), ongoing investigation, risk of evidence tampering and witness intimidation, and the absence of changed circumstances, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Court, Baramati All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case