SANSKAR ABASO PATOLE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 96/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU140002532026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
195/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
96/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
10-ADHOC D.J. 1 AND ADJ BARAMATI DISTRICT PUNE.
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
690
Police Station
DAUND P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANSKAR ABASO PATOLE
Adv. JAMDAR RAHUL BALWANTRAO
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: 10-ADHOC D.J. 1 AND ADJ BARAMATI DISTRICT PUNE.
Disposed
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Order | |
| 23-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 18-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The Special Judge at Baramati rejected the bail application of Sanskar Abaso Patole, accused of murdering his father Dattatray Patole under sections 103(1) and 238 r/w. 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement based on ten injuries found on the deceased's body, medical opinion of death by intracranial hemorrhage due to trauma, witness statements, and the accused's conduct in attempting to conceal evidence. Considering the serious nature of the offense (punishable by life imprisonment or death), ongoing investigation, risk of evidence tampering and witness intimidation, and the absence of changed circumstances, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Special Judge at Baramati rejected the bail application of Sanskar Abaso Patole, accused of murdering his father Dattatray Patole under sections 103(1) and 238 r/w. 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement based on ten injuries found on the deceased's body, medical opinion of death by intracranial hemorrhage due to trauma, witness statements, and the accused's conduct in attempting to conceal evidence. Considering the serious nature of the offense (punishable by life imprisonment or death), ongoing investigation, risk of evidence tampering and witness intimidation, and the absence of changed circumstances, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts