State Yavat P S vs Tukaram Bhikaji Koditkar — 27/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 324(4),352,351(2). Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHPU140002372026
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
179/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
27/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
16-District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
FIR Details
FIR Number
1004
Police Station
YAWAT P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Yavat P S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Bhikaji Koditkar
Hearing History
Judge: 16-District Judge -4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 23-02-2026 | Hearing Before Charge | |
| 21-02-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 20-02-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 18-02-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
BAIL GRANTED The court allowed the bail application of Tukaram Bhikaji Koditkar under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The accused is released on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and one or two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including no intimidation of witnesses, no future criminal activity, submission of relatives' details, and identity documents. The court found that continued incarceration would constitute impermissible punitive detention given the completed investigation, filed charge-sheet, and maximum 5-year punishment for the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL GRANTED The court allowed the bail application of Tukaram Bhikaji Koditkar under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The accused is released on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and one or two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including no intimidation of witnesses, no future criminal activity, submission of relatives' details, and identity documents. The court found that continued incarceration would constitute impermissible punitive detention given the completed investigation, filed charge-sheet, and maximum 5-year punishment for the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts