Neha Santosh Ghorpade vs Pralhad Ishwar Bhandari — 22/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHPU140001922020
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
192/2020
Filing Date
24-01-2020
Registration No
22/2020
Registration Date
28-01-2020
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
10-ADHOC D.J. 1 AND ADJ BARAMATI DISTRICT PUNE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Neha Santosh Ghorpade
Adv. KULTHE SACHIN ASHOK
Sravani SAntosh Ghorpade
Adv. KULTHE SACHIN ASHOK
Aatish Santosh ghorpade thrugh Neha Santosh Ghorpade
Adv. KULTHE SACHIN ASHOK
Respondent(s)
Pralhad Ishwar Bhandari
Future General India Insurance co. ltd.
Adv. barge vishal vijayrao
Hearing History
Judge: 10-ADHOC D.J. 1 AND ADJ BARAMATI DISTRICT PUNE.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In MACP No. 22/2020, the Additional Sessions Judge rejected Respondent No. 2's application to add the owner and insurance company of a Scorpio vehicle (MH-14/BX-9227) as party respondents. The court found that the negligence issue concerning the driver of vehicle MH12/GR-8004 should be decided on evidence at final judgment, not at the interim stage, and noted that Respondent No. 2 failed to raise the non-joinder defense in their written statement. Application dismissed on 22.08.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In MACP No. 22/2020, the Additional Sessions Judge rejected Respondent No. 2's application to add the owner and insurance company of a Scorpio vehicle (MH-14/BX-9227) as party respondents. The court found that the negligence issue concerning the driver of vehicle MH12/GR-8004 should be decided on evidence at final judgment, not at the interim stage, and noted that Respondent No. 2 failed to raise the non-joinder defense in their written statement. Application dismissed on 22.08.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts