State OF Maharashtra vs Ganesh Kondiba Thombare Advocate - Wagh Sachin Sudhakar — 8/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,341,324,504,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHPU140001622019
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
27/2019
Filing Date
09-01-2019
Registration No
8/2019
Registration Date
19-01-2019
Court
Additional District Court, Baramati
Judge
4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI
FIR Details
FIR Number
455
Police Station
BARAMATI TALUKA P.S.
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State OF Maharashtra
Adv. Navale Kamalakar Shankarrao
Respondent(s)
Ganesh Kondiba Thombare Advocate - Wagh Sachin Sudhakar
Sampat @ Vishal Kondiba Thombare
Akshay Najya Bajirao Jadhav
Kondiba Bhairu Thombare
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSION JUDGE BARAMATI
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The application filed by accused No. 1 and 3 to relax bail conditions (prohibiting entry into Baramati Taluka and weekly police reporting) imposed on 26/06/2024 has been rejected. The court upheld the strict conditions citing that the accused had initially undertaken not to enter the victim's village until trial completion, and the conditions mirror those imposed by the Bombay High Court on a co-accused, with no grounds to deviate from this consistent approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The application filed by accused No. 1 and 3 to relax bail conditions (prohibiting entry into Baramati Taluka and weekly police reporting) imposed on 26/06/2024 has been rejected. The court upheld the strict conditions citing that the accused had initially undertaken not to enter the victim's village until trial completion, and the conditions mirror those imposed by the Bombay High Court on a co-accused, with no grounds to deviate from this consistent approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts