Milind Ankush Awale vs The state of Maharashtra Through Baramati City Police Station — 62/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHPU140001342026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

95/2026

Filing Date

29-01-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Court

Additional District Court, Baramati

Judge

33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

27

Police Station

BARAMATI CITY P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4), 338, 339, 340, 336(3), 336(2), 340(2), 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Milind Ankush Awale

Adv. HOLKAR ANIL KISANRAO

Respondent(s)

The state of Maharashtra Through Baramati City Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 33-DISTRICT JUDGE 1 AND ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE BARAMATI

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Order on Exh

27-02-2026

Order on Exh

23-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

20-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati rejected the anticipatory bail application of Milind Ankush Awale, accused of forging his wife's signature on a correction-deed to sell her gifted property (valued at over 50 lakhs) to third parties. The court found prima facie evidence of forgery supported by a handwriting expert's report and held that document-related criminal offences require custodial interrogation and investigation, rejecting the accused's argument that the dispute was purely civil in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati rejected the anticipatory bail application of Milind Ankush Awale, accused of forging his wife's signature on a correction-deed to sell her gifted property (valued at over 50 lakhs) to third parties. The court found prima facie evidence of forgery supported by a handwriting expert's report and held that document-related criminal offences require custodial interrogation and investigation, rejecting the accused's argument that the dispute was purely civil in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Court, Baramati All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case