Vijay Rajaram Dhumal vs State of Maharashtra Through APP Baramati — 2/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3A). Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 23-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal

CNR: MHPU140000372026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

26/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

Additional District Court, Baramati

Judge

33-District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

BARAMATI TALUKA P.S.

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Rajaram Dhumal

    Adv. PATIL SUNIL BABASAHEB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) Baramati

Case History

  1. 23-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 1 And Addl.sessions Judge Baramati

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The appellate court suspended the conviction and one-year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, subject to the appellant depositing Rs. 40,000 (additional compensation) within one week. The accused was granted bail on personal bond and surety bond of Rs. 25,000 each, pending further hearing of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The appellate court suspended the conviction and one-year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, subject to the appellant depositing Rs. 40,000 (additional compensation) within one week. The accused was granted bail on personal bond and surety bond of Rs. 25,000 each, pending further hearing of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case