Nikhil Sanjay Shinde vs Rajendra Narayan Shinde Advocate - Langhi harshad Suresh — 10/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,35,36. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU130020462023
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
20-12-2023
Filing Number
573/2023
Filing Date
22-12-2023
Registration No
10/2024
Registration Date
24-01-2024
Court
Civil Court,Saswad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nikhil Sanjay Shinde
Adv. Bansode Ajit Chandrakant
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Narayan Shinde Advocate - Langhi harshad Suresh
Gangubai Narayan Shinde
Aasha Dhanjay Katke
Rajan Bharat Shaha
Adv. Kolte Amit Ganpat
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 07-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 17-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 03-12-2025 | Compliance |
| 29-09-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The application for plaint rejection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was partly allowed. The court found that the plaintiff undervalued the suit property (house property worth Rs. 5,47,878/- was valued at only Rs. 3,000/-) and consequently paid insufficient court fees. The plaintiff is directed to correct the valuation as per market value and pay the deficit court fee within 30 days, failing which the plaint will be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The application for plaint rejection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was partly allowed. The court found that the plaintiff undervalued the suit property (house property worth Rs. 5,47,878/- was valued at only Rs. 3,000/-) and consequently paid insufficient court fees. The plaintiff is directed to correct the valuation as per market value and pay the deficit court fee within 30 days, failing which the plaint will be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts