PRASHANT TANAJI KOLATE vs ZINAT YASIN SHAIKH Advocate - Dhende Ganesh Ramdas — 308/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 35 TO 39. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU130016812025
e-Filing Number
11-09-2025
Filing Number
446/2025
Filing Date
16-Sep-2025
Registration No
308/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Court
Civil Court,Saswad
Judge
2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRASHANT TANAJI KOLATE
Adv. PATHARE AMOL ANKUSH
-
2.AANAJI SUBHANA KOLATE
Adv. PATHARE AMOL ANKUSH
-
3.VIJAY LAXMAN ZINZURKE
Adv. PATHARE AMOL ANKUSH
Respondent(s)
-
1.ZINAT YASIN SHAIKH Advocate - Dhende Ganesh Ramdas
-
2.PRAJAKTA RAJENDRA PAGARE
Adv. Dhende Ganesh Ramdas
-
3.PRAFULL RAJENDRA PAGARE
Adv. Dhende Ganesh Ramdas
Case History
-
02-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad
-
22-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad
-
02-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad
-
10-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad
-
19-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
19-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 308 of 2025, the court issued a show cause notice to the defendants asking why an ad-interim ex-parte injunction should not be granted against them. The court found it necessary to provide defendants an opportunity to be heard before deciding on the injunction. Interlocutory applications, if any, were allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 308/2025
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 308 of 2025, the court issued a show cause notice to the defendants asking why an ad-interim ex-parte injunction should not be granted against them. The court found it necessary to provide defendants an opportunity to be heard before deciding on the injunction. Interlocutory applications, if any, were allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts