State Of Maharashtra - Saswad vs Keraba Kisan Mandhare Advocate - Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao — 205/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,34. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU130015372023
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
Filing Number
1128/2023
Filing Date
04-10-2023
Registration No
205/2023
Registration Date
07-10-2023
Court
Civil Court,Saswad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C
FIR Details
FIR Number
328
Police Station
Saswad Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra - Saswad
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Keraba Kisan Mandhare Advocate - Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao
Digambar Kisan Mandhare
Adv. Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao
Prabhavai Haridas Mandhare
Adv. Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 23-12-2025 | Hearing |
| 29-11-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The Court rejected the application filed under Section 319 CrPC seeking to add Hariba @ Haridas Kisan Mandhare and Dattatrey Kaluram Mandhare as accused persons. The Court found that mere presence at the spot without any specific allegations of criminal acts, lack of supporting evidence during investigation, and absence of witness statements against these two persons were insufficient grounds to proceed against them. The application was dismissed as there was no material to establish any criminal role or culpability on their part. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Court rejected the application filed under Section 319 CrPC seeking to add Hariba @ Haridas Kisan Mandhare and Dattatrey Kaluram Mandhare as accused persons. The Court found that mere presence at the spot without any specific allegations of criminal acts, lack of supporting evidence during investigation, and absence of witness statements against these two persons were insufficient grounds to proceed against them. The application was dismissed as there was no material to establish any criminal role or culpability on their part. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts