State Of Maharashtra - Saswad vs Keraba Kisan Mandhare Advocate - Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao — 205/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,34. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU130015372023

Hearing

Next Hearing

13th May 2026

Filing Number

1128/2023

Filing Date

04-10-2023

Registration No

205/2023

Registration Date

07-10-2023

Court

Civil Court,Saswad

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C

FIR Details

FIR Number

328

Police Station

Saswad Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,34

Petitioner(s)

State Of Maharashtra - Saswad

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Keraba Kisan Mandhare Advocate - Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao

Digambar Kisan Mandhare

Adv. Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao

Prabhavai Haridas Mandhare

Adv. Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C

04-04-2026

Hearing

07-03-2026

Hearing

17-01-2026

Hearing

23-12-2025

Hearing

29-11-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

29-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: The Court rejected the application filed under Section 319 CrPC seeking to add Hariba @ Haridas Kisan Mandhare and Dattatrey Kaluram Mandhare as accused persons. The Court found that mere presence at the spot without any specific allegations of criminal acts, lack of supporting evidence during investigation, and absence of witness statements against these two persons were insufficient grounds to proceed against them. The application was dismissed as there was no material to establish any criminal role or culpability on their part. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Court rejected the application filed under Section 319 CrPC seeking to add Hariba @ Haridas Kisan Mandhare and Dattatrey Kaluram Mandhare as accused persons. The Court found that mere presence at the spot without any specific allegations of criminal acts, lack of supporting evidence during investigation, and absence of witness statements against these two persons were insufficient grounds to proceed against them. The application was dismissed as there was no material to establish any criminal role or culpability on their part. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Saswad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case