State Of Maharashtra - Saswad vs Keraba Kisan Mandhare Advocate - Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao — 205/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,34. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 13-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHPU130015372023

Filing Number

1128/2023

Filing Date

04-Oct-2023

Registration No

205/2023

Registration Date

07-Oct-2023

Court

Civil Court,Saswad

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

328

Police Station

Saswad Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra - Saswad

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Keraba Kisan Mandhare Advocate - Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao

  2. 2.Digambar Kisan Mandhare

    Adv. Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao

  3. 3.Prabhavai Haridas Mandhare

    Adv. Bhagat Sagar Hanumantrao

Case History

  1. 13-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  6. 29-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: The Court rejected the application filed under Section 319 CrPC seeking to add Hariba @ Haridas Kisan Mandhare and Dattatrey Kaluram Mandhare as accused persons. The Court found that mere presence at the spot without any specific allegations of criminal acts, lack of supporting evidence during investigation, and absence of witness statements against these two persons were insufficient grounds to proceed against them. The application was dismissed as there was no material to establish any criminal role or culpability on their part. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 29-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  9. 04-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  10. 16-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  11. 28-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  12. 02-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  13. 19-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  14. 19-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  15. 03-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  16. 06-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  17. 05-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  18. 11-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  19. 24-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  20. 10-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  21. 30-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  22. 13-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  23. 13-May-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  24. 18-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  25. 13-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  26. 17-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  27. 16-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  28. 06-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  29. 01-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C

  30. 09-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 04-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 205/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Court rejected the application filed under Section 319 CrPC seeking to add Hariba @ Haridas Kisan Mandhare and Dattatrey Kaluram Mandhare as accused persons. The Court found that mere presence at the spot without any specific allegations of criminal acts, lack of supporting evidence during investigation, and absence of witness statements against these two persons were insufficient grounds to proceed against them. The application was dismissed as there was no material to establish any criminal role or culpability on their part. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case