Madhavi Santosh Gaikwad vs Santosh Suresh Gaikwad Advocate - Lanke Sachin Anant — 9/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 12,18,21,22,19. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHPU130011472025
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
07-07-2025
Filing Number
859/2025
Filing Date
08-07-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
10-07-2025
Court
Civil Court,Saswad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C
FIR Details
Police Station
Saswad Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Madhavi Santosh Gaikwad
Adv. Rajvardhan Dattatray Kadam
Respondent(s)
Santosh Suresh Gaikwad Advocate - Lanke Sachin Anant
Putalabai Suresh Gaikwad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 11-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 08-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-12-2025 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for temporary custody of two daughters (ages 4 and 8) during the Diwali vacation period (17.10.2025 to 31.10.2025) filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA) has been adjourned. The court declined to grant immediate custody, holding that such matters involving tender-age children cannot be decided within one day without proper inquiry into the children's best interests and welfare, and requires the respondent's full say in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for temporary custody of two daughters (ages 4 and 8) during the Diwali vacation period (17.10.2025 to 31.10.2025) filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA) has been adjourned. The court declined to grant immediate custody, holding that such matters involving tender-age children cannot be decided within one day without proper inquiry into the children's best interests and welfare, and requires the respondent's full say in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts