State Of Maharashtra - Saswad vs Nita Balasaheb Mansuke Advocate - Bharambe Avinash Ekanath, Bharambe Anushri Avinash, Bharambe Anushri AvinashJAGTAP AKASH PRAMOD, — 116/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHPU130010072022
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
690/2022
Filing Date
11-07-2022
Registration No
116/2022
Registration Date
11-07-2022
Court
Civil Court,Saswad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C
FIR Details
FIR Number
90
Police Station
Saswad Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra - Saswad
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Nita Balasaheb Mansuke Advocate - Bharambe Avinash Ekanath, Bharambe Anushri Avinash, Bharambe Anushri AvinashJAGTAP AKASH PRAMOD,
Vitthal Shankar Jagtap
Ratan Shankar Jagtap
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-01-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 17-12-2025 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the application filed by accused nos. 1-3 to conduct cross-examination of the informant, which had been denied on 30/03/2024 due to their counsel's medical absence. The court set aside the previous "No-cross-examination" order after accepting the advocate's medical certificate showing hospitalization for hernia, finding sufficient cause in the interest of justice and fair trial. The prosecution was directed to present the informant on the next date for cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the application filed by accused nos. 1-3 to conduct cross-examination of the informant, which had been denied on 30/03/2024 due to their counsel's medical absence. The court set aside the previous "No-cross-examination" order after accepting the advocate's medical certificate showing hospitalization for hernia, finding sufficient cause in the interest of justice and fair trial. The prosecution was directed to present the informant on the next date for cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts