Dattatray Krishnaji Kshirsagar Gurav. vs Suryakant Krishnaji KshirsagarGurav. Advocate - Shinde nandakumar baburao — 2200225/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU130007372013
Filing Number
2200225/2013
Filing Date
20-Aug-2013
Registration No
2200225/2013
Registration Date
21-Aug-2013
Court
Civil Court,Saswad
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dattatray Krishnaji Kshirsagar Gurav.
Adv. nazirkar shubhash raghunath
Respondent(s)
-
1.Suryakant Krishnaji KshirsagarGurav. Advocate - Shinde nandakumar baburao
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
17-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
01-Nov-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
23-Sep-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
12-Aug-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
21-Jun-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
22-Mar-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
08-Oct-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
19-Aug-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
24-Jun-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
23-Nov-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
12-Oct-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
25-Aug-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
03-Jul-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
06-May-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
18-Jan-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
22-Nov-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
20-Oct-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
15-Sep-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
01-Aug-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
10-Jun-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2022
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
16-Nov-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
06-Oct-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
06-Sep-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
05-Jul-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
26-Apr-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2021
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
26-Oct-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
11-Sep-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
22-Jul-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
05-Mar-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2020
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
22-Oct-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
21-Sep-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
26-Jun-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2019
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
07-Sep-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
26-Jul-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
14-Jun-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2018
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC to add proposed defendants 2-7 and amend the plaint to include additional paragraphs and prayers relating to the dispute over rights to perform Puja at Shrinath Mhaskoba temple. The court found that the amendment related to the same subject matter, would not change the nature of the suit, and would enable complete adjudication of the controversy; since the trial had not literally commenced (no evidence laid), the amendment was permissible. The plaintiff was ordered to pay Rs. 2,000 as cost to the defendant and file amended plaint copies by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jan-2018
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
05-Dec-2017
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
07-Oct-2017
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
31-Aug-2017
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
10-Aug-2017
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
01-Jul-2017
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
15-Jun-2017
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
21-Mar-2017
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
11-Jan-2017
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
22-Nov-2016
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
05-Nov-2016
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
24-Sep-2016
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2016
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
12-Aug-2016
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
26-Jul-2016
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
11-Jul-2016
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2016
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2016
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2015
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
28-Sep-2015
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2015
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
07-Aug-2015
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
22-Jul-2015
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
08-Jun-2015
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2015
Issues
-
06-Jan-2015
Issues
-
07-Nov-2014
Issues
-
09-Sep-2014
Issues
-
17-Jun-2014
Issues
-
25-Mar-2014
Issues
-
05-Feb-2014
Issues
-
24-Jan-2014
Issues
-
15-Jan-2014
Issues
-
06-Dec-2013
Issues
-
08-Nov-2013
Issues
-
25-Oct-2013
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
22-Oct-2013
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
18-Oct-2013
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
17-Oct-2013
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
10-Oct-2013
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
08-Oct-2013
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
07-Oct-2013
Argument on Exh.____Unready
-
05-Oct-2013
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
-
03-Oct-2013
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
-
30-Sep-2013
Unready Board
-
24-Sep-2013
Unready Board
-
11-Sep-2013
Unready Board
-
23-Aug-2013
Unready Board
-
22-Aug-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Aug-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 2200225/2013
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC to add proposed defendants 2-7 and amend the plaint to include additional paragraphs and prayers relating to the dispute over rights to perform Puja at Shrinath Mhaskoba temple. The court found that the amendment related to the same subject matter, would not change the nature of the suit, and would enable complete adjudication of the controversy; since the trial had not literally commenced (no evidence laid), the amendment was permissible. The plaintiff was ordered to pay Rs. 2,000 as cost to the defendant and file amended plaint copies by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts