Monika Akshay Inamke vs Shashikant Dnyandev Garud Advocate - Pilane babu namdeo — 13/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 20 rule 18. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHPU130000252026

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

02nd May 2026

e-Filing Number

11-01-2026

Filing Number

13/2026

Filing Date

12-01-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Court

Civil Court,Saswad

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order 20 rule 18
Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Monika Akshay Inamke

Adv. Konde Rohit Krishna

Respondent(s)

Shashikant Dnyandev Garud Advocate - Pilane babu namdeo

Diksha Shashikant Garud Through Natural Guardian Shashikant Dnyandev Garud

Vikas Dnyandev Garud

Dnyandev Dinkar Garud

Dhananjay Prakash Garud

Malan Sudam Satav

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C

04-04-2026

Awaiting Summons

07-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

07-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

17-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

17-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Civil Judge Junior Division, Saswad issued a show cause notice to defendant nos. 1, 5 & 6, requiring them to explain why an ad-interim ex-parte injunction should not be granted against them. The court found it necessary to provide defendants an opportunity to be heard before deciding on the injunction. Any interim relief requested by the petitioner was allowed, subject to the defendants' response to the notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Civil Judge Junior Division, Saswad issued a show cause notice to defendant nos. 1, 5 & 6, requiring them to explain why an ad-interim ex-parte injunction should not be granted against them. The court found it necessary to provide defendants an opportunity to be heard before deciding on the injunction. Any interim relief requested by the petitioner was allowed, subject to the defendants' response to the notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court,Saswad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case