Ajay Nivruti Deshmukh vs Amol Balasahab Dhumal Advocate - Chavan Pruthviraj Uttamrao — 92/2025
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 36 to 39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 01st April 2026 Date Not Updated.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU120006512025
Next Hearing
01st April 2026 Date Not Updated
e-Filing Number
21-07-2025
Filing Number
135/2025
Filing Date
22-07-2025
Registration No
92/2025
Registration Date
22-07-2025
Court
Civil Court,Bhor
Judge
2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajay Nivruti Deshmukh
Adv. Ghone Vikram Kiran
Respondent(s)
Amol Balasahab Dhumal Advocate - Chavan Pruthviraj Uttamrao
Hearing History
Judge: 2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOR
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 18-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary The defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC to reject the suit on grounds of lack of cause of action and the suit being barred by law has been rejected. The court found that the plaint clearly discloses a cause of action regarding obstruction to an MSEB electricity connection, and that an agro-based farmers group registered under the State Agriculture Department can validly file disputes before a civil court. The plaintiff and defendant are directed to proceed with arguments on the interim injunction application (Exhibit 5) on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC to reject the suit on grounds of lack of cause of action and the suit being barred by law has been rejected. The court found that the plaint clearly discloses a cause of action regarding obstruction to an MSEB electricity connection, and that an agro-based farmers group registered under the State Agriculture Department can validly file disputes before a civil court. The plaintiff and defendant are directed to proceed with arguments on the interim injunction application (Exhibit 5) on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts