Ajay Nivruti Deshmukh vs Amol Balasahab Dhumal Advocate - Chavan Pruthviraj Uttamrao — 92/2025

Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 36 to 39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 01st April 2026 Date Not Updated.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHPU120006512025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

01st April 2026 Date Not Updated

e-Filing Number

21-07-2025

Filing Number

135/2025

Filing Date

22-07-2025

Registration No

92/2025

Registration Date

22-07-2025

Court

Civil Court,Bhor

Judge

2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOR

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 36 to 39

Petitioner(s)

Ajay Nivruti Deshmukh

Adv. Ghone Vikram Kiran

Respondent(s)

Amol Balasahab Dhumal Advocate - Chavan Pruthviraj Uttamrao

Hearing History

Judge: 2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOR

25-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

20-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

18-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-03-2026

Order on Exh

12-03-2026

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

18-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC to reject the suit on grounds of lack of cause of action and the suit being barred by law has been rejected. The court found that the plaint clearly discloses a cause of action regarding obstruction to an MSEB electricity connection, and that an agro-based farmers group registered under the State Agriculture Department can validly file disputes before a civil court. The plaintiff and defendant are directed to proceed with arguments on the interim injunction application (Exhibit 5) on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC to reject the suit on grounds of lack of cause of action and the suit being barred by law has been rejected. The court found that the plaint clearly discloses a cause of action regarding obstruction to an MSEB electricity connection, and that an agro-based farmers group registered under the State Agriculture Department can validly file disputes before a civil court. The plaintiff and defendant are directed to proceed with arguments on the interim injunction application (Exhibit 5) on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Bhor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case