Pandhrinath Gangaram Kank etc.9 vs Ganpat Kondiba Kank — 2700087/2011
Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU120004572011
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2700087/2011
Filing Date
14-06-2011
Registration No
2700087/2011
Registration Date
14-06-2011
Court
Civil Court,Bhor
Judge
1-JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. BHOR, PUNE
Petitioner(s)
Pandhrinath Gangaram Kank etc.9
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Ganpat Gangaram Kank
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Ravaji Yesu Kank
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Bhau Yesu Kank
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Kondiba Dhondiba Kank
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Ankush Dhondiba Kank
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Santosh Dhondiba Kank
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Maruti Pandurang Kank
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Phulchand Pandurang Kank
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Navnath Pandurang Kank
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Respondent(s)
Ganpat Kondiba Kank
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. BHOR, PUNE
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 07-02-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 20-01-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 20-12-2025 | Reply/Say | |
| 06-12-2025 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition (Nishaani No. 64) filed by the defendant against the "counter-examination denied" order was allowed with costs of Rs. 1,000 payable by the plaintiff to the defendant. After the plaintiff pays the cost amount, the defendant is permitted to conduct the counter-examination of the plaintiff's witness, as the defendant had not been given adequate opportunity earlier despite being present with counsel on the previous date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition (Nishaani No. 64) filed by the defendant against the "counter-examination denied" order was allowed with costs of Rs. 1,000 payable by the plaintiff to the defendant. After the plaintiff pays the cost amount, the defendant is permitted to conduct the counter-examination of the plaintiff's witness, as the defendant had not been given adequate opportunity earlier despite being present with counsel on the previous date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts