Prakash Manohar Rajpoot(Legal Heir) vs Padu Narayan Jagtap Advocate - Khunte Shrinivas Sahebrao — 35/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU120002732016
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
40/2016
Filing Date
11-03-2016
Registration No
35/2016
Registration Date
15-03-2016
Court
Civil Court,Bhor
Judge
2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prakash Manohar Rajpoot(Legal Heir)
Adv. Ingale Anil Ashok1.
Lata Prakash Rajput 1.
Nitin Prakash Rajput 1.
Chaitrali Siddharth Rajput 1.
Nikita Rahul Rajput
Respondent(s)
Padu Narayan Jagtap Advocate - Khunte Shrinivas Sahebrao
Madhu Dinkar Jagtap
Dinkar Narayan Jagtap
Hearing History
Judge: 2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOR
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The court modified the earlier orders and allowed the plaintiff's petition in this property dispute case. The court directed the defendants to either transfer ownership rights to the disputed property to the plaintiff (as per the sale agreement) or grant the plaintiff ownership rights in the property. The court found that the sale agreement was valid and that the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance of the contract with economic compensation to the defendants as per the CPC 1908 Order 39. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court modified the earlier orders and allowed the plaintiff's petition in this property dispute case. The court directed the defendants to either transfer ownership rights to the disputed property to the plaintiff (as per the sale agreement) or grant the plaintiff ownership rights in the property. The court found that the sale agreement was valid and that the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance of the contract with economic compensation to the defendants as per the CPC 1908 Order 39. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts