Pushpa Ramchandra Shivtare vs Prashant Ramchandra Shivtare Advocate - Deshmukh Mayur Jaysingh — 50/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU120002532021
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
69/2021
Filing Date
03-04-2021
Registration No
50/2021
Registration Date
03-04-2021
Court
Civil Court,Bhor
Judge
3-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C., Bhor
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pushpa Ramchandra Shivtare
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Swati Ramchandra Shivtare
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Vaibhav Ramchandra Shivtare
Adv. Mukadam Vijay Vishnu
Respondent(s)
Prashant Ramchandra Shivtare Advocate - Deshmukh Mayur Jaysingh
Pravin Ramchandra Shivtare
Pramod Ramchandra Shivtare
Subhash Shankar Shivtare(Legal Heir)
Chandrakant Shankar Shivtare
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C., Bhor
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: JS-FN-E Q-U A 50/2021 | Court: JMFC, Bhor, Pune | Date: 08/09/2022 Outcome: The petition (Application No. 35) is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's plea for police assistance in a civil dispute involving land possession. The court found that police intervention was inappropriate as the matter involved competing civil claims between parties, and directed the petitioner to pursue remedies through proper civil court procedures instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: JS-FN-E Q-U A 50/2021 | Court: JMFC, Bhor, Pune | Date: 08/09/2022 Outcome: The petition (Application No. 35) is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's plea for police assistance in a civil dispute involving land possession. The court found that police intervention was inappropriate as the matter involved competing civil claims between parties, and directed the petitioner to pursue remedies through proper civil court procedures instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts