Ankush Laxman Veer vs Khodiba Parsuram Veer etc 12 Advocate - Adv. V. V. Mukadam — 2700032/2012
Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU120000632012
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2700032/2012
Filing Date
14-02-2012
Registration No
2700032/2012
Registration Date
14-02-2012
Court
Civil Court,Bhor
Judge
2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOR
Petitioner(s)
Ankush Laxman Veer
Adv. Deshmukh Mayur Jaysingh
Namdev Balvant Veer
Adv. Adv. Dhumal
Suresh Sonba Veer(Legal Heir)
Adv. Adv. Dhumal3.
Digambar Suresh Veer 3.
Nanda Suresh Veer 3.
Maya Sandip chavan 3.
Rani Rupesh Mahangare
Respondent(s)
Khodiba Parsuram Veer etc 12 Advocate - Adv. V. V. Mukadam
Shashikant Kondiba Veer
Vitthal Kashinath Veer
Hanumant Kashinath Veer
Mangesh Sudam Gole
Vitthal Sadashiv Gole(Legal Heir)
Shivaji Genba Mozar
Sampat Bhiku Gole
Yashwant Shankar Veer
Sudam Khandu Gole
Kashinath Rambhau Veer
Narayan Sitaram Gole
Hearing History
Judge: 2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOR
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 07-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 21-01-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 25-11-2025 | Defence Evidence | |
| 03-10-2025 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition was allowed. Respondent No. 6 (Vitthal Sadashiv Gole) died on 01-07-2023, necessitating his legal heirs be impleaded as parties to the suit. The court granted the petition to add the heirs of the deceased respondent to the case and adjourned the matter to the next hearing date for proper substitution of parties in accordance with the original suit proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition was allowed. Respondent No. 6 (Vitthal Sadashiv Gole) died on 01-07-2023, necessitating his legal heirs be impleaded as parties to the suit. The court granted the petition to add the heirs of the deceased respondent to the case and adjourned the matter to the next hearing date for proper substitution of parties in accordance with the original suit proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts