Shivaji Laxuman Mane vs Govind Laxuman Thopate Advocate - Shete Rajendra Maruti — 2700132/1987
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU120000021987
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2700132/1987
Filing Date
05-08-1987
Registration No
2700132/1987
Registration Date
05-08-1987
Court
Civil Court,Bhor
Judge
1-JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. BHOR, PUNE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivaji Laxuman Mane
Adv. Lad Prakash Baban
Respondent(s)
Govind Laxuman Thopate Advocate - Shete Rajendra Maruti
Dattatray Vitthal Bandal
Adv. Shete Rajendra Maruti
Dilip Genba Nikam
Adv. Shete Rajendra Maruti
Vahida Bhabi Dadaminya shaikh(Legal Heir)
Keshav Haribhau Deshmane
Suresh Ramchandra Goregaonkar
Vijaya Keshav Deshmane
Raghunath Janu Patil dead(Legal Heir) 8.
Kusum Raghunath Patil
Adv. Shete Rajendra Maruti
B.Shrikant Raghunath Patil
C.Tarkeshwari Santosh Bhosale(Legal Heir)
D. Smita Chandrakant Nigade
Adv. Shete Rajendra Maruti
Sushma Sunil Patil
Adv. kadam
Shripati Vithu Chopdar(Legal Heir)
Kisan Dhondiba Dere
Shankar Mahadev Rajivade
Krushna Tukaram Shete(Legal Heir)
Adv. Shete Rajendra Maruti
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. BHOR, PUNE
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 21-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 12-02-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 21-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: In a permanent injunction suit (Shivaji Mane v. Govind Thopate, pending since 1987), Defendant No. 12's application to exhibit certain documents was rejected. The court found that the defendant had full knowledge of the documents' status during evidence but deliberately closed his case without seeking their exhibition, and filed the belated application only after evidence concluded and the matter was posted for final arguments. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In a permanent injunction suit (Shivaji Mane v. Govind Thopate, pending since 1987), Defendant No. 12's application to exhibit certain documents was rejected. The court found that the defendant had full knowledge of the documents' status during evidence but deliberately closed his case without seeking their exhibition, and filed the belated application only after evidence concluded and the matter was posted for final arguments. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts