Nitin Chaganlal Jain vs The Commisioner Pimpari Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Pimpari, Pune — 35/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU100002522018
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
37/2018
Filing Date
27-08-2018
Registration No
35/2018
Registration Date
27-08-2018
Court
Civil Court,Pcmc
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C., P.C.M.C. Akurdi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nitin Chaganlal Jain
Adv. KADAM SHRIKANT KESHAV
Respondent(s)
The Commisioner Pimpari Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Pimpari, Pune
Lahuraj Ramchandra Shinde
Ujwala Lahuraj Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C., P.C.M.C. Akurdi
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed defendant no. 3's application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, finding that the plaintiff Nitin Chaganlal Jain lacked proper standing and authority to continue the suit. The court struck out the plaintiff's name and added his mother, Sushilabai Chaganlal Jain, as the rightful plaintiff, as she is the actual owner of the adjacent property at the center of the dispute regarding unauthorized construction and demolition claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed defendant no. 3's application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, finding that the plaintiff Nitin Chaganlal Jain lacked proper standing and authority to continue the suit. The court struck out the plaintiff's name and added his mother, Sushilabai Chaganlal Jain, as the rightful plaintiff, as she is the actual owner of the adjacent property at the center of the dispute regarding unauthorized construction and demolition claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts