Ms. Bhuvi A-Wing Sah. San. Mar., Wakad thro Chairman 1.Gokul Babarao Sawale 2. Parag Hemchand Bhat vs The Commissioner, Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Pimpri, Pune 18 Advocate - APP — 66/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU100001652023
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
67/2023
Filing Date
19-08-2023
Registration No
66/2023
Registration Date
19-08-2023
Court
Civil Court,Pcmc
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C., P.C.M.C. Akurdi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ms. Bhuvi A-Wing Sah. San. Mar., Wakad thro Chairman 1.Gokul Babarao Sawale 2. Parag Hemchand Bhat
Adv. Adv. Datta Shendge
Respondent(s)
The Commissioner, Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Pimpri, Pune 18 Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Mohan Purushottam Raut
Chaitanya Sudhan Lad
M/s Vitthal Properties (Partnership Firm) Through Partner Nandkumar Shankarrao Kokate
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C., P.C.M.C. Akurdi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 31-01-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 20-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction application filed by defendants no. 2 and 3 under Order 39 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs (Bhuvi A Wing Sahakari Sanstha) are restrained from implementing a resolution dated 07/09/2025 regarding demarcation and marking of parking slots in the disputed property. The court found that defendants established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and irreparable loss would result if the injunction were not granted, as the matter is pending before the civil court and the property should not be altered without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction application filed by defendants no. 2 and 3 under Order 39 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs (Bhuvi A Wing Sahakari Sanstha) are restrained from implementing a resolution dated 07/09/2025 regarding demarcation and marking of parking slots in the disputed property. The court found that defendants established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and irreparable loss would result if the injunction were not granted, as the matter is pending before the civil court and the property should not be altered without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts