Jamil Ahmad Abdul Shakur Chowdhari vs Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Pimpri, Pune 18 Advocate - Yadav Shashanka Ajit — 32/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHPU100000332025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

28-01-2025

Filing Number

32/2025

Filing Date

30-01-2025

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

30-01-2025

Court

Civil Court,Pcmc

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C., P.C.M.C. Akurdi

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Jamil Ahmad Abdul Shakur Chowdhari

Adv. RAJBHUSHAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Pimpri, Pune 18 Advocate - Yadav Shashanka Ajit

Designated officer and Regional officer

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C., P.C.M.C. Akurdi

07-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

19-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

25-11-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

09-10-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

22-08-2025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready

Interim Orders

30-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In Civil Suit No. 32/2025 (Jamil Choudhary v. P.C.M.C. & Ors.), the court issued a show cause notice to defendants regarding why an ex-parte temporary injunction should not be granted against them under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC, 1908. The case was adjourned with the notice returnable on 01/02/2025, and emergency protection/stay was allowed if prayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Suit No. 32/2025 (Jamil Choudhary v. P.C.M.C. & Ors.), the court issued a show cause notice to defendants regarding why an ex-parte temporary injunction should not be granted against them under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC, 1908. The case was adjourned with the notice returnable on 01/02/2025, and emergency protection/stay was allowed if prayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Pcmc All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case