Bharatram Ramsamuj prajapati vs Designated officer and Regional officer Ka Prabhag Regional office Advocate - Bhapkar Maruti Genaba — 20/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHPU100000202025

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

22-01-2025

Filing Number

20/2025

Filing Date

23-01-2025

Registration No

20/2025

Registration Date

23-01-2025

Court

Civil Court,Pcmc

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C., P.C.M.C. Akurdi

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Bharatram Ramsamuj prajapati

Adv. Dhanpat Mansaram Yadav, Singh Rajbhushan Awadhkishore

Respondent(s)

Designated officer and Regional officer Ka Prabhag Regional office Advocate - Bhapkar Maruti Genaba

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C., P.C.M.C. Akurdi

07-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

19-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

25-11-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

09-10-2025

Argument on Exh.____Ready

21-08-2025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready

Interim Orders

21-04-2025
Issues

Case Status Summary: This is an issues framing order (not a final judgment) in civil suit R.C.S. No. 20/2025 before the P.C.M.C. Court, Pune. The court has framed five issues for trial, including whether the defendant's notice dated 08/01/2025 is illegal and void, and whether the plaintiff is entitled to mandatory injunction and permanent injunction as prayed. The case has been set for further proceedings on these issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary: This is an issues framing order (not a final judgment) in civil suit R.C.S. No. 20/2025 before the P.C.M.C. Court, Pune. The court has framed five issues for trial, including whether the defendant's notice dated 08/01/2025 is illegal and void, and whether the plaintiff is entitled to mandatory injunction and permanent injunction as prayed. The case has been set for further proceedings on these issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Pcmc All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case