Satish Mohan Sherkhane vs Krushna Ankush Rajiwade — 1077/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3). Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHPU090096422025

Unready Board

Next Hearing

30th April 2026

e-Filing Number

15-11-2025

Filing Number

8915/2025

Filing Date

17-11-2025

Registration No

1077/2025

Registration Date

18-11-2025

Court

Civil Court,Pimpri

Judge

5-7th Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPARI

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3)

Petitioner(s)

Satish Mohan Sherkhane

Adv. SHARMA NIDHI

Respondent(s)

Krushna Ankush Rajiwade

Arjun Ankush Rajiwade

Adv. Bitale Akshay Bharat

Kiran Valmiki

Hearing History

Judge: 5-7th Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPARI

07-03-2026

Unready Board

20-12-2025

Unready Board

19-12-2025

Unready Board

18-12-2025

Unready Board

27-11-2025

Unready Board

Interim Orders

27-11-2025
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The petition filed under Section 175(3) BNSS by the applicant seeking directions to register an FIR under POSCO Act for the alleged kidnapping of a minor girl was rejected. The court held that since Crime No. 335/2025 was already registered under Section 137(2) BNS for kidnapping and investigation was ongoing, the magistrate could not interfere with the investigation process or direct registration of a fresh FIR merely on grounds of allegedly unfair investigation. The court found the application unmaintainable in law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed under Section 175(3) BNSS by the applicant seeking directions to register an FIR under POSCO Act for the alleged kidnapping of a minor girl was rejected. The court held that since Crime No. 335/2025 was already registered under Section 137(2) BNS for kidnapping and investigation was ongoing, the magistrate could not interfere with the investigation process or direct registration of a fresh FIR merely on grounds of allegedly unfair investigation. The court found the application unmaintainable in law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Pimpri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case