Satish Mohan Sherkhane vs Krushna Ankush Rajiwade — 1077/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3). Status: Unready Board. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHPU090096422025
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
15-11-2025
Filing Number
8915/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
1077/2025
Registration Date
18-11-2025
Court
Civil Court,Pimpri
Judge
5-7th Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPARI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Satish Mohan Sherkhane
Adv. SHARMA NIDHI
Respondent(s)
Krushna Ankush Rajiwade
Arjun Ankush Rajiwade
Adv. Bitale Akshay Bharat
Kiran Valmiki
Hearing History
Judge: 5-7th Jt. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPARI
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Unready Board | |
| 20-12-2025 | Unready Board | |
| 19-12-2025 | Unready Board | |
| 18-12-2025 | Unready Board | |
| 27-11-2025 | Unready Board |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under Section 175(3) BNSS by the applicant seeking directions to register an FIR under POSCO Act for the alleged kidnapping of a minor girl was rejected. The court held that since Crime No. 335/2025 was already registered under Section 137(2) BNS for kidnapping and investigation was ongoing, the magistrate could not interfere with the investigation process or direct registration of a fresh FIR merely on grounds of allegedly unfair investigation. The court found the application unmaintainable in law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under Section 175(3) BNSS by the applicant seeking directions to register an FIR under POSCO Act for the alleged kidnapping of a minor girl was rejected. The court held that since Crime No. 335/2025 was already registered under Section 137(2) BNS for kidnapping and investigation was ongoing, the magistrate could not interfere with the investigation process or direct registration of a fresh FIR merely on grounds of allegedly unfair investigation. The court found the application unmaintainable in law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts